Skip booklet index and go to page content

Performance Report on Environment Canada's 2012-2013 Departmental Sustainable Development Strategy

Environment Canada’s Performance Achievements for 2012–2013 Regarding FSDS Implementation Strategies and Clean Air Agenda Programming


Sub-Program 3.1.1 Substances Management


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

2.3.4 and 3.12.4   Assess 100% of existing commercial substances as identified under the Chemicals Management Plan for risks to human health and/or the environment (100% of total of 4,300 by 2020). (EC, HC)

2.3.4 and 3.12.4   Close to 1,500 existing commercial substances under the CMP will be assessed for risk to human health and/or the environment under the second phase of the CMP (2011–2016).

There will be implementation of risk management measures for those substances identified as being of concern to human health or the environment.

2.3.5 and 3.12.5   Assess 100% of new substances, for which EC has been notified by industry of their intended manufacture or import, to determine if they are suspected of being toxic within the timelines in the regulation or established services standards. (EC, HC)

2.3.5 and 3.12.5   100% of new substances, intended for manufacture and/or import into Canada for which industry has notified Environment Canada, have been assessed within the prescribed regulatory timeline, to determine if the substance is toxic or capable of becoming toxic within the meaning of section 64 of CEPA 1999.

2.3.8 and 3.12.7   Ensure at least one risk management measure is in place within the legally mandated time frames for 100% of substances added to the List of Toxic Substances within. (EC, HC)

2.3.8 and 3.12.7   All substances added to the List of Toxic Substances will have at least one risk management measure in place within the legally mandated timeframes.

Performance Analysis:

In 2012–2013, good progress was made towards the goal of addressing 1,500 remaining priority existing substances, with 6 draft assessments representing 25 substances, and 3 final assessments representing 57 substances published on the Chemicals Substances website. In addition, assessment of all 504 new substances for which EC has been notified by industry of their intent to manufacture or import has been met.

Furthermore, proposed risk management instruments were published for 9 of 9 substances listed on Schedule 1 within required timelines. Final risk management instruments were published for 13 of the 15 substances listed on Schedule 1 within the required timelines.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

2.3.10   Work with the OECD and with the U.S. and Mexico under the auspices of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation to foster green growth collaborative initiatives. (EC)

2.3.10   Canada will continue participation in OECD meetings or workshops.

The production of a report on greenhouse gas mitigation scenarios from material management options in OECD countries, as well as a synthesis report on SMM, concluding the work on SMM since 2005.

New work will be initiated on nanowaste management and critical materials management.

Canada’s participation in the work under the CEC will establish a clearer picture of the transboundary movements (flows) of used and end-of-life computers and monitors in/from North America, and will enhance capacities of e-waste refurbishing and recycling sectors to implement environmentally sound management practices.

Performance Analysis:

In 2012–2013, Canada continued to be actively engaged in Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) activities and meetings under the Environment, Health and Safety Programme, particularly the Joint Meeting on Chemicals and the Working Party on Chemicals, Pesticides and Biotechnology. The work carried out by the OECD and member countries contributes directly to the delivery of Canada’s Chemicals Management Plan, in particular through leveraging the work for the assessment of chemicals and domestic priority setting.

Canada also participated in the work and meetings of the Working Party on Resource Productivity and Wastes. This work led to the publication of  three OECD publications in 2012:

  1. the report on Greenhouse Gas Emissions and the Potential for Mitigation From Materials Management Within OECD Countries, which highlights the importance of using a life-cycle approach to analyze GHG mitigation options from materials management;
  2. Sustainable Materials Management – Making Better Use of Resources, which outlines a series of policy principles, examines how to set and use targets, and explores various policy instruments for sustainable materials management (SMM); and
  3. Case Study on Critical Metals in Mobile Phones, which develops policy recommendations for OECD member countries to improve the SMM of critical metals. Environment Canada
    • brought Canadian expertise to an international OECD expert workshop on the subject of nanomaterials in the waste stream and subsequent discussion paper; and
    • actively contributed in the project and report on transboundary flows of e-waste, on the Commission on Environmental Cooperation (CEC) Secretariat-led report on spent-lead acid batteries and the preparation of training materials for small and medium-sized enterprises involved in recycling and refurbishing of e-waste.

EC delivered the Notice and Consent Electronic Data Exchange project in 2012, which allowed environmental agencies in Canada, Mexico and the United States to begin sharing export requests and consent documents for the movement of hazardous waste and hazardous recyclable material electronically.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

2.3.11   Work with provincial and territorial authorities to promote waste minimization and diversion, such as the implementation of the Canada-wide Action Plan on Extended Producer Responsibility. (EC)

2.3.11   Environment Canada will continue to support the harmonization of EPR programs across Canada through monitoring, reporting and policy analysis activities.

The EPR and Product Stewardship Inventory of Programs, published by Environment Canada, provides the public with a central place for information on all programs in Canada.

Advance the development of an instrument related to EPR of mercury-containing lamps, including the publication of the proposed regulations in the Canada Gazette, Part I in fall 2012.

Performance Analysis:

In 2012–2013, in consultation with provincial/territorial governments and other relevant organizations, EC updated the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) and Product Stewardship Inventory of Programs in September 2012.

The Department joined the newly formed Waste Management Task Group under the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME), which has been mandated to establish a framework for CCME’s waste management work including developing a Canada-wide strategy for waste reduction. EC also chaired a CCME task group and delivered an options report on the environmental management of end-of-life vehicles.

In March 2013, the Department released the comprehensive Technical Document on Municipal Solid Waste Organics Processing to provide science-based, objective and user-friendly information on the various aspects of organics management. The document drew on lessons learned and expert knowledge of professionals, practitioners and academics in the field of organics management across North America.

In addition, work continued to identify and assess the best approach to address the end-of-life management of mercury-containing lamps. Upon identification of the best path forward, timelines for implementation would be established.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

2.3.6   Apply life-cycle thinking, sustainable materials management and environmentally sound management of hazardous wastes to promote sustainable consumption and minimize the impacts of products and wastes on the environment and human health. (EC, NRCan)

2.3.6   A final declaration was submitted in January 2012 and will be used to determine the final mercury switch capture rate. Results will be published in 2012–2013.

Environment Canada expects that 95% of dental facilities in Canada that use or remove dental amalgams would have best management practices in place for December 2010, at the end of the implementation of the pollution prevention (P2) notice. This target will be evaluated based on the P2 Plan declarations received from dental facilities. A national survey will be conducted to evaluate that level.

Adoption of P2 concepts by targeted users will also be measured by the number of Schedules reported and by waste disposal statistics on the collection of mercury from dental offices and its disposal at appropriate waste management facilities.

Performance Analysis:

A national survey of dental facilities was carried out in 2012 to evaluate the success of the P2 Notice for dental amalgam, as measured by the use of dental amalgam separators and disposal practices. The survey indicated that this P2 Planning Notice achieved the Canada-wide Standard on Mercury for Dental Amalgam Waste objective of a 95percent national reduction of mercury releases to the environment, from a base year of 2000.

The risk management objective of reducing releases of mercury to the environment through participation by vehicle manufacturers and steel mills in a national mercury switch management program in Canada has been achieved.  The annual targets and capture rates of mercury switches set by the vehicle manufacturers have been achieved for the most part. However, the ultimate goal of achieving a capture rate of 90 percent within the first 4 years of the Program, as listed in the Notice, has not been achieved, as reported in the Declarations of Implementation. The Final Report on the Pollution Prevention Planning Notice in Respect to Mercury Releases from Mercury Switches in End-of-Life Vehicles Processed by Steel Mills is expected to be published in 2013.

Top of Section

Sub-Program 3.1.2 Waste Management


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

3.7.1   Work collaboratively with provinces to conduct and disseminate research on wastewater effluent. (EC)

3.7.1   Establishment of the Science and Research Coordination Body.

Development of the Canada-wide research agenda.

Completion of the review of the existing biosolids and wastewater research agendas of federal, provincial, territorial and municipal governments.

Initiation of consultations on best mechanisms to help meet the national scientific research and information dissemination needs that are identified.

Performance Analysis:

This Implementation Strategy is no longer applicable.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

3.7.2   Implement the federal aspects of the CCME strategy for the management of municipal wastewater effluent in Canada through effluent regulations under the Fisheries Act and through agreements with provinces and territories by 2012. Work with the Northwest Territories, Nunavut, Quebec, and Newfoundland and Labrador to complete policy analysis and research for minimum performance standards for wastewater effluent for the Far North. (EC)

3.7.2   Conduct field surveys of the selected Far North sewage treatment facilities with respect to their treatment performance and opportunities for optimization. Most of this work will focus on sewage lagoons and effluent polishing wetlands.

Prepare a report on the performance of monitored sewage treatment facilities, in the context of the Canadian Council of the Ministers of the Environment (CCME) strategy, and assess the feasibility of computer modelling of such facilities.

Publication of the final regulations in the Canada Gazette, Part II, targeted for 2012.

Establish bilateral administrative agreements with provinces supportive of such agreements and Yukon by the end of 2012.

Engage stakeholder on the standards for the North by April 2012.

3.7.3   Ensure compliance with performance standards for higher risk wastewater effluents by 2020. (EC)

3.7.3   Publication of final regulations in the Canada Gazette, Part II, targeted for 2012. This will create performance measures that are applicable after 2020.

Performance Analysis:

EC published the Wastewater Systems Effluent Regulations in the Canada Gazette, Part II, in 2012 and is implementing the Regulations to achieve secondary wastewater treatment across the country. The Department has put in place an electronic wastewater regulatory reporting system to streamline administration of the Regulations and will continue to work with provinces to establish bilateral agreements to avoid duplication wherever possible.

In 2012–2013, EC conducted field surveys of wastewater systems (lagoons) in the Far North and continued on preparing a report on the treatment performance of the monitored systems. The report is expected to be completed in 2013–2014. EC has also engaged stakeholders on standards and a regulatory regime for the North and intends to continue to work towards the development of a wastewater regime that sets appropriate standards for the climatic conditions found in the North.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

3.8.9 and 3.9.9   Advance positions that can influence global rules and practices on dumping waste at sea and other marine pollution matters. (EC, TC)

3.8.9 and 3.9.9   Develop Canadian positions and advance them at the London Protocol. Canada expects to achieve at least 50% of its positions.

Performance Analysis:

In 2012–2013, Canada was successful in advancing its positions at both the Meeting of the Parties of the London Protocol and at the Scientific Groups meeting of the London Protocol and Convention. Meeting objectives for Canada were achieved for 60 percent of issues, the remaining 40 percent were partially achieved, and work is ongoing. Canada set positions on 5 main issues: ocean fertilization regulation; spoilt cargo management; rules for exporting CO2 to sub-seabed geological formations for storage; guidance on creating action levels for assessing fish waste; and seeking the Chairmanship of the Meeting.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

3.8.13 and 3.9.13   Ensure that 90% of CEPA 1999 disposal at sea permits are issued within 120 days. (EC)

3.8.13 and 3.9.13   Service standard of 90% of permits issued within 120 days will be met on an ongoing basis.

Performance Analysis:

The issuing of permits under the Disposal at Sea Program met the service standard overall, as 93 percent of permits were issued within 120 days of receipt of the application.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

3.8.3 and 3.9.3   Provide advice on garbage, ballast water, sewage and other marine pollution to support Canadian positions in international commitments.
(TC, EC)

3.8.3 and 3.9.3   Provide support towards the development of Canadian positions on the issue. Support the management of ship-based garbage (Garbage Annex of the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships [MARPOL] and coordination with London Protocol) and ship recycling, and support the advance of these positions at the Marine Environmental Protection Committee of the International Maritime Organization and with Transport Canada domestically.

Performance Analysis:

Environment Canada did provide advice and support on requests from Transport Canada.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

3.8.4 and 3.9.4   Collect required data to support the International Maritime Organization, the United Nations Environmental Programme and other domestic and international organizations. (TC, EC)

3.8.4 and 3.9.4   Coordinated the development of Canada’s national report on the Global Programme of Action.

Submitted Canada’s national report prior to the 3rd Intergovernmental Review of the GPA in fall 2011.

Performance Analysis:

Implementation Strategy completed.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

6.4.5 and 6.5.5   Develop spill models, analysis methods, fate and behaviour algorithms, measurement and remote sensing capabilities, decontamination protocols, and countermeasures used during incidents. (EC)

6.4.5 and 6.5.5   Publish scientific journal papers and peer-reviewed conference proceedings.

Prepare the annual Arctic and Marine Oilspills Program (AMOP) Technical Seminar on Environmental Contamination and Response.

6.4.6 and 6.5.6   Provide scientific and technical advice on weather and sea state and the behaviour and effects of chemicals, sampling and analysis, countermeasures, sensitivity mapping, trajectory, modelling, and operation of the 24/7 National Environmental Emergencies Centre in OttawaFootnote 9. (EC)

6.4.6 and 6.5.6   By spring 2013, EC will finalize negotiations of the Notification Agreements (a national environmental emergency notification system) with provinces and territories west of Quebec).

EC provides scientific advice or support to environmental emergency incidents.

EC will continue to provide accurate and timely advisories to senior managers for pollution incidents from across Canada on a 24/7 basis, 365 days a year.

EC will continue providing weather, wildlife, hazardous substance and response advice to responders on a 24/7 basis, 365 days a year.

Performance Analysis:

In 2012–2013, EC provided science-based expert advice to reduce the environmental effects of environmentally significant pollution incidents as per its legislative mandate under the Fisheries Act and CEPA 1999. Activities included managing a 24/7 National Environmental Emergency Centre (NEEC). Senior managers received 57 emergency advisories on incidents of a significant nature; EC was notified of approximately 15 to 25 spills or releases per day in 2012–2013 and provided, through the NEEC, scientific and technical advice to inform adequate response and recovery decisions and actions.

In addition, in June 2012 EC successfully delivered the annual AMOP Technical Seminar on Environmental Contamination and Response. The seminar took place in Vancouver, British Columbia, and was attended by more than 140 national and international world experts in oil and chemical spills. Furthermore, the Department published more than 23 scientific journal papers and peer-reviewed conference proceedings in 2012–2013.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

6.4.9 and 6.5.9   Promote compliance, track and report number of environmental emergency plans in place as required by s. 200 Environmental Emergency Planning Regulations under CEPA 1999.  (EC)

6.4.9 and 6.5.9   A baseline for quality of plans has been established, and improvements to the baseline will continue to be tracked as compliance promotion visits are made to selected facilities.

EC will implement the amendments to the Environmental Emergency Regulations in 2012–2013.

Performance Analysis:

In 2012–2013, EC undertook activities in support of improving the quality of E2 plans. The Department reviewed a number of plans that were submitted voluntarily. Using qualitative information collected from compliance promotion officers and enforcement officers, EC identified elements of E2 plans that were commonly found to be deficient, and have used this information to improve tools and communications to regulatees. 

With regards to implementing the amendments made in December 2011, EC communicated the information by participating in over 25 conferences, workshops and stakeholder meetings. Regulatees were corresponded with directly (via email) to inform them of the changes to the regulations. A large number of inquiries (more than 2,000) were responded to this fiscal year via generic email box, direct email and direct telephone calls, among other means.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

6.4.4 and 6.5.4   Coordinate both national and regional environmental emergency preparedness capabilities. (EC)

6.4.4 and 6.5.4   Complete Environment Canada’s Strategic Emergency Management Plan (SEMP) by summer 2012, in collaboration with Public Safety Canada.

Revise its national and regional contingency plans in light of the completed SEMP, by the end of March 2013.

Complete regional annexes to the Canada–U.S. inland Contingency Plan by the fall 2012.

Performance Analysis:

The Implementation Strategy is no longer applicable.

Top of Section

Sub-Program 3.1.3 Environmental Emergencies


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

6.4.5 and 6.5.5   Develop spill models, analysis methods, fate and behaviour algorithms, measurement and remote sensing capabilities, decontamination protocols, and countermeasures used during incidents. (EC)

6.4.5 and 6.5.5   Publish scientific journal papers and peer-reviewed conference proceedings.

Prepare the annual Arctic and Marine Oilspills Program (AMOP) Technical Seminar on Environmental Contamination and Response.

6.4.6 and 6.5.6   Provide scientific and technical advice on weather and sea state and the behaviour and effects of chemicals, sampling and analysis, countermeasures, sensitivity mapping, trajectory, modelling, and operation of the 24/7 National Environmental Emergencies Centre in OttawaFootnote 10 . (EC)

6.4.6 and 6.5.6   By spring 2013, EC will finalize negotiations of the Notification Agreements (a national environmental emergency notification system) with provinces and territories west of Quebec).

EC provides scientific advice or support to environmental emergency incidents.

EC will continue to provide accurate and timely advisories to senior managers for pollution incidents from across Canada on a 24/7 basis, 365 days a year.

EC will continue providing weather, wildlife, hazardous substance and response advice to responders on a 24/7 basis, 365 days a year.

Performance Analysis:

Performance information on implementation strategies 6.4.5, 6.5.5, 6.4.6, and 6.5.6 could be found under Sub-Program 3.1.2.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

6.4.9 and 6.5.9   Promote compliance, track and report number of environmental emergency plans in place as required by s. 200 Environmental Emergency Planning Regulations under CEPA 1999.  (EC)

6.4.9 and 6.5.9   A baseline for quality of plans has been established, and improvements to the baseline will continue to be tracked as compliance promotion visits are made to selected facilities.

EC will implement the amendments to the Environmental Emergency Regulations in 2012–2013.

Performance Analysis:

Performance information on implementation strategies 6.4.9 and 6.5.9 could be found under Sub-Program 3.1.2.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

6.4.4 and 6.5.4   Coordinate both national and regional environmental emergency preparedness capabilities. (EC)

6.4.4 and 6.5.4   Complete Environment Canada’s Strategic Emergency Management Plan (SEMP) by summer 2012, in collaboration with Public Safety Canada.

Revise its national and regional contingency plans in light of the completed SEMP, by the end of March 2013.

Complete regional annexes to the Canada–U.S. inland Contingency Plan by the fall 2012.

Performance Analysis:

The Implementation Strategies are no longer applicable.

Top of Section

Sub-Program 3.1.4 Contaminated Sites


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

3.12.1   Federal custodians plan and undertake assessment and remediation / risk management activities at contaminated sites for which they are responsible in order to reduce human health and ecological risks at higher priority sites. (EC)

3.12.1   For the FCSAP program overall:

Remediation/risk management plans will be implemented at the 400 highest-risk federal sites by 2015–2016, with annual assessment of progress.

Specifically for EC:

Implementation of remediation / risk management plans will be completed at 16 of the Department’s highest-risk sites by 2015–2016, with annual assessment of progress.

3.12.2   Guidance and program policies developed by the Program Secretariat and the expert support departments are used by federal custodians in the program implementation activities.  (EC)

3.12.2   Sustainability tools and training are provided to custodians to help them integrate sustainable decision making into the management of contaminated sites.

Performance Analysis:

During the first two years of Phase II of the Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan, FCSAP (2011–2016), federal departments, agencies and consolidated Crown corporations have implemented remediation/risk management plans at 77 sites, which represents about 20 percent of the 5-year target.  

Furthermore, the FCSAP Secretariat and Public Works and Government Services undertook an analysis of the benefits of using sustainable approaches and guidance for considering sustainability during the decision-making process of managing federal contaminated sites; the development of training materials for federal site managers; and additional work on the Sustainable Development Analysis Tool to assist federal custodians in choosing the most sustainable remediation / risk management solution for their contaminated sites.

In 2012–2013, FCSAP funds were used at a total of 8 of EC’s 16 highest-risk sites. A total of 11 of the 16 sites will have implementation of remediation or risk management activities by 2015–2016. The 5 remaining sites will likely not have any implementation of remediation or risk management plans due to a lack of funding and site accessibility issues.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

2.3.2   Guidance and program policies developed by the Program Secretariat and the expert support departments are used by federal custodians in the program implementation activities. (EC)

The Implementation Strategy is no longer applicable.

Performance Analysis:

The Implementation Strategy is no longer applicable.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

2.3.3 and 3.12.3   In 2010–2011, site assessments will be undertaken on an estimated 1,500 projects by 15 federal custodians in total, while an estimated 500 remediation / risk management projects will be implemented by 17 custodians in total. (EC)

The Implementation Strategy is no longer applicable.

Performance Analysis:

Implementation Strategies no longer applicable.

Top of Section

Sub-Program 3.2.1 Climate Change and Clean Air Regulatory Program


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

1.1.4   Develop and provide information and reports on atmospheric science assessments related to climate change (EC).

1.1.4   There will be a qualitative assessment of the satisfaction of government decision makers with the timeliness, credibility and relevance of atmospheric science advice and assessment related to climate change.

1.1.5   Undertake and deliver scientific research and reporting in support of regulatory and other programs, including data analysis, inventory development, monitoring, modelling and assessment of the effectiveness of efforts, as well as research on options, costs and benefits, and technology assessments.
(EC, HC, NRCan, TC)

1.1.5   Meet annual international reporting obligation for the UNFCCC.

Meet annual domestic reporting obligations under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (CEPA 1999).

Performance Analysis:

In 2012–2013, EC collected facility data on greenhouse gas emissions under section 46 of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999. Economy-wide emissions and removals of greenhouse gases were estimated and the national greenhouse gas inventory was submitted on April 15, 2013 as per the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) requirements. Two reports were posted: the National Inventory Report in April, and the Overview Report of facility emissions in May 2013.

For performance information on Implementation Strategy 1.1.4, please refer to Sub-Program 2.1.3.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

1.1.7   Develop and implement a single window reporting initiative for national emissions reporting. (EC)

1.1.7   In 2012–2013, EC will continue discussions with other provinces and EC regulatory programs interested in using the EC SWR. This ongoing work will be expanded to support an inclusive Canadian approach for data collection.

Performance Analysis:

In 2012–2013, discussions with provinces interested in using the Single Window Reporting (SWR) system have been pursued for the collection of GHG emissions data. EC SWR has also been expanded to include new reporting modules for the following federal programs: the Chemicals Management Plan, the Vehicle Engine and Emissions Reporting Registry, the Effluent Regulatory Reporting Information System, and the Renewable Fuels Regulation Electronic Reporting System.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

1.1.6   Develop climate change strategies harmonized with United States as part of Canada’s commitment to meet Target 1.1. (EC)

1.1.6   Implementation of Passenger Automobile and Light Truck GHG Emissions Regulations beginning with the 2011 model year.

Development of GHG regulations to reduce emissions from heavy-duty vehicles, aligned with the U.S.

Finalization of regulations to reduce GHG emissions from the coal-fired thermal electricity sector. Work is also underway to extend GHG regulatory approaches to all major emitting sectors and to develop regulations for other major emitting industrial sectors, including oil and gas.

1.1.10   Develop regulations under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 to address greenhouse gas emissions from heavy-duty vehicles, aligned with the United States but taking into consideration the distinct nature of the Canadian fleet. The draft regulations are expected to be available for consultation in the fall of 2010. (EC, TC)

1.1.10   In August 2011, a consultation document was released. Work to finalize regulations will continue.

1.1.11   Develop a performance standard for high-emitting coal-fired thermal electricity generation to transition to low- or non-emitting generation such as renewable energy, high-efficiency natural gas, or thermal power with carbon capture and sequestration (CCS). (EC)

1.1.11   Work to finalize regulations will continue.

Performance Analysis:

In 2012–2013, EC continued work to develop climate change strategies, aligned with the United States as appropriate, as part of Canada’s commitment to meet Federal Sustainability Development Strategy Target 1.1 (to reduce its total greenhouse gas emissions to 17 percent below 2005 levels by 2020). The federal government is working with other levels of government, industry and stakeholders on a greenhouse gas (GHG) regulatory approach for the oil and gas sector. In addition, the federal government is developing sector-specific regulatory approaches to address GHG emissions from other major-emitting industrial sectors. Work is currently underway for several sectors, including natural gas-fired electricity, fertilizers, chemicals, aluminum, iron and steel, base metals smelting, cement, and pulp and paper.

Furthermore, EC published proposed and final Heavy-Duty Vehicle GHG Emission regulations to reduce emissions from heavy duty vehicles for 2014 and beyond model years. EC also received and reviewed company submissions for 2011 end of year and 2012 model year preliminary reports.

In 2012–2013, EC published the Reduction of Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Coal-Fired Generation of Electricity Regulations in Canada Gazette, Part II, on September 12, 2012. The performance standard in these regulations will come into force in 2015. 

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

1.1.12   Continue to work with the provinces and territories to develop coherent greenhouse gases approaches. (EC)

1.1.12   Federal-Provincial-Territorial Working Group progress on Domestic Climate Change: 2 to 3 meetings to be held in 2012–2013.

Federal-Provincial-Territorial Oil and Gas GHG Working Group: 4 to 5 meetings to be held in 2012–2013.

Performance Analysis:

In 2012–2013, EC continued to maintain dialogue with provinces and territories as part of the process to develop regulatory approaches to reducing GHG emissions. Ongoing significant engagement has taken place through sector-specific working groups, which include federal/provincial/territorial governments as well as the industries involved.

The deputy minister-level Federal-Provincial-Territorial Consultations Steering Committee met twice during 2012–2013.  Additionally, the Federal-Provincial-Territorial Oil and Gas GHG Working Group at the operational level met five times during that period.

The Department has been also discussing the development of equivalency agreements with interested provinces to reduce duplication around federal GHG regulations. Under an equivalency agreement, the provincial regulation applies instead of the federal regulation if an equivalent or better environmental outcome is expected to be achieved under the provincial regime. 

In 2012, EC developed a draft equivalency agreement with Nova Scotia for the federal regulations to address carbon dioxide emissions from coal-fired electricity generation. The agreement was posted on the EC website and a notice of availability was published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, in September 2012.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

1.1.9   Develop greenhouse gas (GHG) emission regulations for new cars and light trucks beginning with the 2011 model year. (EC)

1.1.9   These regulations are now being implemented.

The vehicles and engines that are covered by the Regulations for the 2011–2016 period will be subject to performance reporting, testing and verification.

Performance Analysis:

The Implementation Strategy was completed.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

1.1.8   Develop renewable fuels regulations to mandate a 5% renewable fuel content in gasoline. (EC)

1.1.8   In 2010, regulations requiring 5% renewable content based on the gasoline pool were published. In 2011, EC developed the Regulations Amending the Renewable Fuels Regulationsto require a 2% renewable content minimum in diesel fuel and heating oil.

This implementation strategy was completed in July 2011 when the amendments were published in the Canada Gazette.

Performance Analysis:

The Implementation Strategy was completed.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

1.1.18   Continue to support a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Railway Association of Canada that ensures the rail industry continues to improve its GHG emissions performance during the period 2006–2010. (EC, TC)

1.1.18   Environment Canada provides expertise and advice to Transport Canada as needed.

Performance Analysis:

The Implementation Strategy is no longer applicable.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

2.1.1   National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) tracking through the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (CEPA 1999). (EC)

2.1.1   NPRI information will be collected by June 1 and will be published based on the timelines shown below.

Preliminary facility-reported information will be published on the NPRI website within two months after June 1.

Reviewed (quality-controlled) facility-reported information will be published within six months after June 1 (December).

Comprehensive emissions data (which includes facility-reported data and additional area source calculations) will be published within 10 months after June 1 (April).

Percentage of facilities reporting emissions to the National Pollutant Release Inventory that provide fully compliant reports in their initial response within mandated timeframes.

2.1.32   Submit air pollutant inventories to meet international reporting requirements, using the National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI), to the UN Economic Commission for Europe to meet the reporting obligations of the Protocols ratified under the Convention on Long Range Transboundary Air Pollution). (EC)

2.1.32   The timeline for submission of data to meet the various reporting obligations varies. A key deadline is the annual deadline of February 15 to submit emissions data for key pollutants to the UNECE and the collection of this data is done through the NPRI process.

Performance Analysis:

In 2012–2013, NPRI information was collected by June 29, 2012.  An amendment to the normal June 1 deadline was published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, in April 2012, to allow those who were subject to the Notice with respect to substances in the NPRI more time to comply, given the required updates to the online reporting system for NPRI and its partners.

NPRI data publication was later than in past years due to the implementation of ongoing improvements to EC’s online reporting (data collection) system. The preliminary facility-reported data were published on November 22, 2012. The reviewed facility-reported data were published on May 23, 2013. A total of 89.3 percent of facilities reported emissions to the National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) and provided compliant reports in their initial responses within mandated time frames.

The Air Pollutant Emission Inventory (APEI) or comprehensive emissions data were published and submitted to the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe on February 15, 2013.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

2.1.2   Undertake scientific research and reporting in support of regulatory and other programs delivered, including data analysis, inventory development, monitoring, modelling and assessment of the effectiveness of efforts as well as research on options, costs and benefits including economic and social and technology assessments. (EC, NRCan, HC, TC)

2.1.2   Publication of comprehensive air emissions data on sources of key air pollutants in Canada, as part of the NPRI, annually by April.

Satisfaction of government decision makers with the timeliness, credibility and relevance of technology advice and assessment as measured through user group evaluation questionnaires and consultations. (Target: 80% by 2014.)

2.1.4   Develop and provide atmospheric science assessments related to air quality. (EC)

2.1.4   There will be a qualitative assessment of the satisfaction of government decision makers (e.g. any federal air quality user groups) with the timeliness, credibility and relevance of atmospheric science advice and assessment related to air quality.

There will be publication of peer-reviewed literature contributing to the advancement of scientific knowledge, the availability of monitoring data and maps to set baseline levels and track benefits of control measures, and improvements of model capability to predict atmospheric conditions.

Performance Analysis:

In 2012–2013, EC published comprehensive emissions data on sources of key air pollutants. The Air Pollutant Emission Inventory (APEI) provides comprehensive emissions data; it was developed from the National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) data for both point-source and in-house estimates for non-point sources (e.g. transportation and agriculture). The APEI was published on February 15, 2013.

EC continued to provide important air quality scientific knowledge, data, maps, test results, publications, predictive model improvements and outputs, and science advice to inform decisions and actions related to air quality management. In 2012–2013, EC published more than 45 scientific peer-reviewed publications related to air quality issues.

The Department published the Highlights and Key Messages summary of the Canadian Smog Science Assessment in April 2012 on its website. Co-authored by EC and Health Canada (HC), the Canadian Smog Science Assessment is a two-volume, comprehensively researched and independently peer-reviewed scientific evaluation of the formation and fate of smog in Canada and its impact on the health of Canadians and their environment. Over 40 EC scientists and experts partnered with HC and academic experts to produce the Assessment. The purpose of the Assessment was to support the process to develop the new national AQMS, being led by the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. The Assessment was also a deliverable under the Clean Air Regulatory Agenda (CARA). The full text of the Assessment will be available in 2013.

For additional information on Implementation Strategy 2.1.2 please refer to performance information on Implementation Strategy 2.1.1 above.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

2.1.5   Continue to implement air pollutant emission regulations for various classes of on-road and off-road compression-ignition engines and small spark-ignition engines and fuels. (EC)

2.1.5   The various classes of vehicles and engines that are covered by current regulations are tested for compliance with emissions standards.


Performance Analysis:

In 2012–2013, EC conducted compliance tests on light-duty vehicles, heavy-duty vehicles, motor cycles and scooters, off-road small spark-ignition (gas) engines and off-road compression-ignition (diesel) engines and marine engines and recreational vehicles. EC’s assessment resulted in 41 notices of defect and recall notices covering approximately 150,000 vehicles and engines.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

2.1.6   Target regulations on volatile organic compounds (VOC) in some consumer and commercial products, and air pollutants for most transportation (on-road vehicles and engines, off-road compression ignition engines and off-road small spark-ignition engines), including implementation of the regulatory and control measures. (EC)

2.1.6   For regulation of air pollutants from most land transportation (excluding locomotives), see 2.1.5 above.

Conduct compliance promotion activities to increase stakeholder awareness of both the VOC Concentration Limits for Automotive Refinishing Products Regulations and the VOC Concentration Limits for Architectural Coatings Regulations.

In 2012, a study is to be conducted to compare 2011 VOC emissions to 2005 baseline data for the automotive refinishing sector. This is to determine VOC percentage reductions, in order to validate the performance of these Regulations.

2.1.8   Continue to work collaboratively with provinces and territories to develop and implement a coherent approach to managing air quality, including national ambient air quality standards and national industrial emissions requirements for key pollutants. (EC, HC)

2.1.8   Federal regulations development will begin for key major industrial sectors and equipment types by 2013.

Ambient air quality standards for particulate matter and ozone will be established under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act 1999 (CEPA 1999) by the end of 2013.

2.1.10   Develop new regulations to reduce emissions of air pollutants from marine engines and recreational vehicles, on- and off-road diesel engines and off-road large spark-ignition engines. (EC)

2.1.10   In 2012–2013, Environment Canada will begin work on the draft regulations for off-road large spark-ignition engine emissions.

Performance Analysis:

In 2012–2013, EC undertook compliance promotion for Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Concentration Limits for Architectural Coatings Regulations and Volatile Organic Compound Concentration Limits for Automotive Refinishing Products Regulations. In 2013, a Guidance Document regarding the analytical methods for the two VOC Regulations was posted on the VOCs in Consumer and Commercial Products website. With respect to the Volatile Organic Compound Concentration Limits for Architectural Coatings Regulations, compliance promotion officers delivered information about the regulations with a focus on paints used for traffic marking.

EC also performed an analysis on the amount of VOC emissions for the automotive refinishing sector, before and after the regulations (i.e. quantity of VOC released from the regulated products) in 2012–2013, through a voluntary survey. Results indicated that VOCs in automotive refinishing products were reduced by 61 percent for calendar year 2011 relative to 2002 base year. This surpasses the 40 percent reductions that were initially predicted. Product testing will be conducted in 2013–2014 in order to verify compliance with the Regulations.

EC continued to work collaboratively with the provinces and territories to finalize and begin implementation of the new AQMS. In October 2012, federal, provincial, and territorial environment ministers agreed to begin implementation of the new system.  Under the AQMS, the federal government is responsible for developing and publishing the Canadian Ambient Air Quality Standards and implementing the base-level industrial emission requirements (BLIERs) under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999.

EC started phasing in implementation of the new industrial emission standards using both regulations and non-regulatory instruments over the course of 2013–2014.  Pre-regulatory development and consultations with provinces, territories and industry were completed for the first phase of BLIERs (aluminum and alumina, iron and steel, and cement sectors and non-utility industrial boilers and heaters and natural gas-fired reciprocating engines).

EC developed a Canada Gazette notice to formally establish the new ambient air quality standards for fine particular matter and ozone standards under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act 1999. The new standards were published in the Canada Gazette on May 25, 2013.

Work began on the assessment of the environmental effects of sulphur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide to support the development of updated ambient air quality standards for these pollutants.

In support of air quality, EC collaborated with provincial and territorial governments under the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment Mobile Sources Working Group to improve information sharing on transportation emissions.

In 2012–2013, EC performed background analysis of the large spark-ignition market in Canada and began preparing a discussion paper that will serve for stakeholder consultations in the development of draft regulations

For related information, please refer to the Clean Air Agenda program Atmospheric pollutants policy below.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

2.1.7   Continue cooperation with the United States on sustainable transportation and fuel quality. (EC)

2.1.7   Recommendations on changes to Canadian fuel quality regulations take into consideration U.S. planned amendments and ongoing harmonization of Canada–U.S. regulations in the area of transportation.

2.1.9   Work through the World Forum for the Harmonization of Vehicle Regulation to develop harmonized global technical regulations for vehicles and engines to ensure that stringent emission standards will be applied around the world. (EC)

2.1.9   EC will assist in the development of stringent world-wide emission standards called Global Technical Regulations (GTRs).

As a signatory to the 1998 agreement, Environment Canada will continue to attend meetings of the World Forum for the Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations and vote on GTRs in order to assist in the development of stringent emission standards worldwide.

A GTR was approved for motorcycle emissions at the June 2011 meeting. Canada is working towards the implementation of this GTR in alignment with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

2.1.13   Continue to work with the United States and France to implement a designated Emission Control Area for North American coastal areas, under the auspices of the International Maritime Organization (IMO), by 2012.  (TC, EC)

2.1.13   The ECA standards will enter into effect on August 1, 2012. Work to finalize regulations will continue.

Performance Analysis:

In 2012–2013, EC took several regulatory actions under the authority of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 to align Canada’s emission-related standards with those of the United States.

EC worked closely with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) on the implementation of a collaborative work plan under the auspices of the Canada–United States Regulatory Cooperation Council, and the Canada–United States Air Quality Committee.

In partnership with the U.S. EPA, EC convened a workshop with the support of the Canada–United States Clean Energy Dialogue to bring together federal, provincial and state representatives to discuss best practices and lessons learned on various financing mechanisms for retrofitting heavy-duty vehicles to improve emission performance.

In collaboration with the U.S. EPA and the U.S. Department of Energy, EC led Canada’s contribution to the organization of the 5th International Environmentally Friendly Vehicle Conference. 

In 2012–2013, EC continued to actively participate in the development of the global technical regulations under the World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (WP 29). As secretary in the Electric Vehicle and Environment Working Group, the Department organized meetings, in which significant progress was made to develop a technical reference guide.

Canada continues to contribute to the development of Global Technical Regulations (GTRs) (e.g. Heavy Duty Hybrids) and vote on GTRs (e.g. amendments to GTR. No.4 and GTR. No.5). These GTRs influence development of domestic regulations for vehicles and engines.

EC also published final Regulations Amending the Sulphur in Diesel Fuel Regulations in July 2012.  The regulations create a new standard for the allowable sulphur levels in marine diesel fuel, available for large ships, and enable the implementation of the North American Emissions Control Area for ships in Canada.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

2.1.15   Continue to support a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Railway Association of Canada that ensures the rail industry continues to improve emission performance during the 2006–2010 period. (EC, TC)

2.1.15   Environment Canada provides expertise and advice to Transport Canada as needed.

Performance Analysis:

The Implementation Strategy is no longer applicable.

Top of Section

Clean Air Agenda Theme: Clean Air Regulatory Agenda (CARA)


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

Electricity Regulations (Clean Air Agenda)

  • Planned Spending for 2012–2013: $2.69 million
  • Actual Spending for 2012–2013: $1.92 million

Emissions-Intensive Trade-Exposed (EITE) Regulations  (Clean Air Agenda)

  • Planned Spending for 2012–2013: $7.13 million
  • Actual Spending for 2012–2013: $4.44 million

Transportation Regulations  (Clean Air Agenda)

  • Planned Spending for 2012–2013: $8.56 million
  • Actual Spending for 2012–2013: $8.74 million

Oil and Gas Regulations (Clean Air Agenda)

  • Planned Spending for 2012–2013: $6.24 million
  • Actual Spending for 2012–2013: $5.34 million

Consumer and Commercial Products Regulations (Clean Air Agenda)

  • Planned Spending for 2012–2013: $2.06 million
  • Actual Spending for 2012–2013: $1.45 million

Please refer to EC’s 2012–2013 Report on Plans and Priorities Supplementary Table for Horizontal Initiatives for further details.(under “Regulations” in CARA)

Performance Analysis:

Electricity:

To limit GHG emissions from the coal-fired electricity generation, EC published the Reduction of Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Coal-Fired Generation of Electricity Regulations in the Canada Gazette, Part II, on September 12, 2012.  The performance standard in these regulations will come into force in 2015.

Emission-Intensive Trade-Exposed Regulations:

In 2012–2013, the base-level industrial emission requirements (BLIERs) were finalized for all sectors except coal-fired electricity and refineries. Draft regulations were developed for cement production, natural gas-fired stationary reciprocating engines, and non-utility industrial boilers and heaters. Consultation with stakeholders and the development of instruments to implement BLIERS took place in 2012–2013 and will continue throughout 2013-2014.

Work is underway to develop GHG regulatory approaches for the potash, nitrogen fertilizer, aluminum, iron and steel, base metals smelting, cement, and pulp and paper sectors.

EC carried out research, analysis, technology assessments and discussions with industry and the provinces regarding the development of sector-specific performance standards. For example, in the chemical sectors, activities included analysis to ascertain which chemical sectors should be prioritized for regulatory development, data collection from covered industry groups, benchmarking of covered activities, and impacts modelling. This allowed EC to develop the required rationale for the setting performance standards in the chemical sectors.

Transportation:

To further reduce GHG emissions from the transportation sector, EC published proposed and final Heavy-Duty Vehicle (HDV) GHG Emission Regulations for 2014 and beyond, and proposed Passenger Automobile and Light Truck GHG Emission Regulations for model years 2017 and beyond.

EC continued its efforts to reduce air pollutants from the transportation sector. In 2012–2013, EC published final regulations requiring an on-board diagnostic (OBD) system in on-road heavy-duty vehicles to detect malfunctions affecting engines and air pollutant emissions.

Oil and Gas:

In 2012–2013, EC has undertaken extensive discussions with the provinces, territories and industry to develop an approach for GHG regulations for the oil and gas sector.

Consumer and commercial products:

In 2012–2013, EC held extensive consultations with various industry stakeholders to explore the development of control measures for a variety of consumer and commercial products, specifically regarding the Proposed Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Concentration Limits for Certain Products Regulations targeted for publication in the Canada Gazette, Part II, in 2015; and possible control measures on VOC concentration limits for the printing and ink, and for cutback asphalt and emulsified asphalt sectors.  EC also conducted several studies to inform the risk management approach for the printing and ink sector, and further investigated control options for portable fuel containers.  As for aerosol coatings, the Department continued to monitor other jurisdictions’ initiatives and has been gathering data to determine whether risk management actions would warranted.

Also, EC informed interested stakeholders on regulatory obligations for 2-Butoxyethanol Regulations and evaluated the effectiveness of the Environmental Performance Agreement concerning 2-butoxyethanol. Furthermore, compliance promotion activities were undertaken for the Volatile Organic Compound Concentration Limits for Automotive Refinishing Products Regulations and the Volatile Organic Compound Concentration Limits for Architectural Coatings Regulations, with a focus on paints used for traffic marking for the latter.  A guidance document regarding the analytical methods for these two regulations was also posted on Environment Canada’s Industrial, Consumer and Commercial Products website.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

Analysis in Support of Regulations (Clean Air Agenda)

For additional information on this CAA program please refer to “Analysis in Support of Regulations” under Sub-Program 1.3.2.

Please refer to EC’s 2012–2013 Report on Plans and Priorities Supplementary Table for Horizontal Initiatives for further details. (under “Regulations” in CARA)

Performance Analysis:

In 2012–2013, EC provided analytical work in support of the regulatory agenda and other programs. This included individual sector competitiveness analysis, energy/macroeconomic modeling and cost benefit analysis in support of the development of GHG and air pollutant regulations.  In addition, legal services were provided on the policy development and regulatory framework for the CARA.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

Science Integration, Accountability and Benefits of Action (Clean Air Agenda)

  • Planned Spending for 2012–2013: $0.87 million
  • Actual Spending for 2012–2013: $0.38 million

Atmospheric Research, Monitoring and Modelling (Clean Air Agenda)

  • Planned Spending for 2012–2013: $18.21 million
  • Actual Spending for 2012–2013: $13.27 million

Health and Environmental Impacts of Air Pollutants (Clean Air Agenda)

  • Planned Spending for 2012–2013: $2.91 million
  • Actual Spending for 2012–2013: $3.19 million

Oil Sands Science (Clean Air Agenda)

  • Planned Spending for 2012–2013: $2.84 million
  • Actual Spending for 2012–2013: $2.80 million

Please refer to EC’s 2012–2013 Report on Plans and Priorities Supplementary Table for Horizontal Initiatives for further details. (under “Science” in CARA)

Performance Analysis:

Science integration, accountability and benefits of action (Clean Air Agenda):

Scientific research and monitoring activities were carried out. These activities addressed chemical and biological trends in Canadian aquatic ecosystems; refined the use of biomonitoring indicators and indicator species, and survey design and research priorities, to improve the assessment of the biological impacts of contaminant emissions; and involved intensive field research on the effects of mercury on fish-eating wildlife in high-risk ecosystems. Associated science activities that increased the knowledge base included the integration of information from the Canadian Arctic Contaminants Assessment for Mercury into the Canadian Mercury Science Assessment; the publication of synthesized data on mercury in fish and wildlife for input to the Canadian Mercury Science Assessment; and the compilation of results from acid rain biomonitoring in Atlantic Canada in preparation for the National Acid Deposition Assessment.

Atmospheric Research, Monitoring and Modelling:

In 2012–2013, EC undertook scientific research, monitoring and modelling activities related to air pollutants to ensure policy and regulatory activities are informed by sound and relevant science and science advice, and to evaluate that the measures taken achieve their intended purpose.

A number of scientific efforts have been carried out in support of the national AQMS, specifically the renewal of the National Air Pollution Surveillance Program (NAPS) Memorandum of UnderstandingFootnote 11; an evaluation of the fine particulate matter (PM2.5) measurement technology and associated data to ensure uniformed scientific approaches across the country; and continued monitoring of levels and trends of key air pollutants via the complementary NAPS and Canadian Air and Precipitation Monitoring NetworksFootnote 12. In addition, EC developed a sampling methodology in support of the base-level industrial emissions requirements (BLIERS) for PM2.5 and continued to deliver the comprehensive air quality modelling platform to assess the impacts of projected BLIERS and the coal-fired generation of electricity regulations on ambient air quality.

For the National Visibility Monitoring Initiative, EC continued to monitor visibility at key border locations in Canada, including a comparison of Canadian and American monitoring approaches, and validating modelling of visibility for the Pacific Northwest area.  In 2012–2013, EC completed an evaluation study in partnership with Health Canada to identify the health and economic benefits of visibility improvements in the Lower Fraser Valley of British Columbia.  EC’s approach is currently being used by regional partners to establish a visibility management framework and a visibility index for the Lower Fraser Valley of British Columbia. Efforts have also focused on advancing knowledge on the transboundary flow of pollutants across the Pacific and the Canada–United States borders, including Canada and Alaska, and on their transformation and deposition in order to improve and validate air quality prediction models, assess global loading, and understand the impacts on Canadians and their environment. Many of these measurement and research activities support the Canada–United States Air Quality Agreement and other domestic and international obligations. Research results were published in peer-reviewed publications. 

EC also delivered scientific studies focused on emissions from the transportation sector and fuels. Efforts included quantifying emissions (i.e. fine particulate matter and black carbon) from an Arctic vessel, contributing to the assessment of environmental impacts of new transportation technologies, and conducting research on exhaust emissions from light-duty vehicles fuelled with low-level biodiesel blends in support of Health Canada’s Human Health Risk Assessment for Biodiesel Production, Distribution and Use in Canada.

EC also contributed scientific data, information and advice related to the impacts of oil sands development on air quality and ecosystem health.  Efforts were focused on advancing the expansion of monitoring sites in Western Canada to understand fate and deposition of atmospheric pollutants into aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, conducting additional measurements to address data gaps, initiating upgrades to the aerosol portion of EC’s air quality predictive modelling system and starting to provide simulations for policy applications. These activities contribute to the delivery of the Joint Canada–Alberta Implementation Plan for Oil Sands Monitoring (This paragraph also applies to performance results for CAA program Oil Sands Science).

Furthermore, EC provided important scientific knowledge, data, predictive model outputs and advice to inform the successfully negotiated global, legally binding agreement to prevent mercury emissions and releases under the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP), known as the Minamata Convention on Mercury.  EC’s mercury science results are also informing the development of the first Canadian Mercury Science Assessment scheduled to be released in 2013–2014.

EC expanded the Canadian Greenhouse Gas Monitoring Network to include 2 additional sites in the Arctic (for a total of 15 sites across Canada).  Progress was made in the area of GHG modelling to develop and test methodologies to characterize GHG sources and sinks in Canada.

Also, progress was made to couple the Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model to the most recent version (3.6) of the Canadian Land Surface Scheme (CLASS). This work addresses natural influences (fires and wetlands) in the carbon cycle and enhances the ability to represent feedbacks in the Canadian Earth System Model.

Long-term monitoring of aerosols continued at four sites across Canada. Aerosol monitoring capacity was enhanced by adding instruments to existing measurement sites. Work continued to enhance the representation of aerosols in Environment Canada’s Earth System Model to reliably quantify the climate effects of aerosols (including black carbon), which will lead to more reliable projections of snow melt onset. Ongoing climate model evaluation and validation continued using Canadian and international observations.

Collaboration with Canadian academics supported the development of better representation of climate feedback processes of aerosols, clouds and water vapour in EC global and regional climate models.

Health and Environmental Impacts on Air Pollutants:

In 2012–2013, surveillance activities were expanded to resample lakes in British Columbia watersheds to investigate variance between years.  These analyses, together with surveillance activities in past years (2008–2012), have produced an inventory of over 300 lake sites for assessing sensitivity of watersheds to acid deposition. EC’s activities are measuring the capacity of lakes to withstand inputs of acid-causing emissions, and subsequently assisting the Department in establishing target values for emissions to mitigate environmental impacts.

Lakes in northeastern Alberta, northwestern Saskatchewan, southern Northwest Territories and southwestern British Columbia were sampled to determine acidification status, and to initiate a temporal monitoring network to detect changes in acidification status. Two temporal monitoring networks were maintained, and three intensive research sites in the Atlantic, Quebec and Ontario were sampled to quantify air pollution effects on aquatic chemistry and for revision of national critical load maps.

A comprehensive survey was undertaken to monitor mercury in water, sediment, and biota in six water bodies across Canada in the Atlantic Ocean, Hudson’s Bay, Pacific Ocean watersheds and northern Yukon. This monitoring network establishes the knowledge base necessary to assess the impact and effectiveness of existing and past policy and regulatory decisions, further improving environmental performance and working toward environmental sustainability. A field survey of lakes in the Estevan, Saskatchewan area was conducted. This work has provided the first data on current and historical mercury deposition and bioaccumulation downwind of coal-fired generating plants.

Oil Sands Science:

For performance information please refer to oil sands results, under the CAA Atmospheric Research, Monitoring and Modelling program.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

Data Collection and Reporting for GHGs (Clean Air Agenda)

  • Planned Spending for 2012–2013: $7.63 million
  • Actual Spending for 2012–2013: $5.73 million

Data Collection and Reporting for Atmospheric Pollutants (Clean Air Agenda)

  • Planned Spending for 2012–2013: please refer to “Data collection and reporting for atmospheric pollutants” under Sub-Program 2.1.2.
  • Actual Spending for 2012–2013: please refer to “Data collection and reporting for atmospheric pollutants” under Sub-Program 2.1.2.

For additional information on this CAA program please refer to “Data collection and reporting for atmospheric pollutants” under Sub-Program 2.1.2.

Cross-cutting Data Collection and Reporting (Clean Air Agenda)

  • Planned Spending for 2012–2013: $3.02 million
  • Actual Spending for 2012–2013: $1.55 million

Please refer to EC’s 2012–2013 Report on Plans and Priorities Supplementary Table for Horizontal Initiatives for further details. (under “Reporting” in CARA)

Performance Analysis:

Canada's Inventory of Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks 1990–2011 was submitted to the United Nations (UN) on April 15, 2013, meeting Canada’s international reporting obligations under the UNFCCC.  Inventory GHG data are aligned with GHG data by domestic economic sectors, and are used by EC to develop emission projections under various scenario analyses. Discussions are ongoing with key data providers (Statistics Canada, Transport Canada, Agriculture Canada, and Natural Resource Canada) to ensure the ongoing provision of underlying data.

The Canada Gazette notice requiring the reporting of 2012 greenhouse gas emissions by facilities to Environment Canada’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reporting Program was published in September 2012.  The facility-reported data collected for 2011 was published in April 2013 through a harmonized release with the National Inventory Report and updated GHG indicators under the Canadian Environmental Sustainability Indicators (CESI) initiative.  Achievements also included the implementation of data-sharing agreements between Environment Canada and the provinces of British Columbia, Ontario and Manitoba to share facility-reported GHG data collected by Environment Canada under section 46 and section 71 of CEPA 1999, with progress ongoing on similar agreements with other provinces.

The 2011 Air Pollution Emissions Inventory, containing comprehensive estimates for air emissions from all sources of key air pollutants, heavy metals and persistent organic pollutants, was submitted to the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe and published in February 2013.  Analyses and scenario development continued to support the development and monitoring of various regulations, notably in the transportation and industrial sectors, including for regulatory impact assessments on mobile sources and “business-as-usual” projections. Specialized data sets were also developed to support the Canadian Ambient Air Quality System. 

Various activities were undertaken by EC to ensure an efficient maintenance and expansion of the Single Window Reporting system in 2012–2013.  At the beginning of the fiscal year, EC launched updated versions of reporting modules to include required federal and provincial reporting requirements, and improved consistency and efficiency for industry users.

Additionally, information sessions were conducted with industry users to gather feedback and provide guidance for GHG and toxics reporting.

With regards to the expansion of the system, outreach activities were organized and discussions with key potential external and internal partners progressed.  These discussions are expected to result in new partnership agreements in 2013–2014.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

Greenhouse Gas Policy (Clean Air Agenda)

  • Planned Spending for 2012–2013: $4.60 million
  • Actual Spending for 2012–2013: $3.91 million

Cross-cutting Analysis (Clean Air Agenda)

  • Planned Spending for 2012–2013: $3.13 million
  • Actual Spending for 2012–2013: $2.68 million

Please refer to EC’s 2012–2013 Report on Plans and Priorities Supplementary Table for Horizontal Initiatives for further details. (under “Policy Analysis” in CARA)

Performance Analysis:

In 2012–2013, EC led the development of regulatory approaches to reducing GHGs in the oil and gas sector, and the natural gas-fired electricity sector, as well as with numerous emissions-intensive trade-exposed (EITE) industrial sectors. EC’s role includes providing support to meetings of the Process Working Group, which was struck to develop an approach for reducing GHG emissions in the oil and gas sector, and analysis and advice related to cross-cutting policy issues.  EC also continued to support meetings of the deputy minister-level Consultations Steering Committee and the director general-level Federal/Provincial/Territorial Working Group, as well as other meetings with provinces, territories and other stakeholders as required.

Discussions were carried out with the following sectors: chemicals, fertilizers, aluminum, cement, iron and steel, base metals smelting, and pulp and paper. EC has established various sector-specific GHG working groups with affected provinces, territories and industry to discuss approaches to achieving reductions.

EC was also in discussions with several provinces regarding GHG equivalency agreements, which would see a federal regulation stand down in a province where an equivalent or better outcome was forecast under a provincial regime. In 2012, EC developed a draft equivalency agreement with Nova Scotia on the federal regulations to address carbon dioxide emissions from coal-fired electricity generation. The draft agreement was published on the Environment Canada website and a notice of the availability for comment was published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, in September 2012.

EC provided analytical work in support of the regulatory agenda and other programs. This included individual sector competitiveness analysis, energy/macroeconomic modelling and cost-benefits analysis in support of the development of GHG and air pollutant regulations.

EC explored the potential for flexible compliance mechanisms for federal GHG regulations for the oil and gas sector and emission-intensive trade-exposed sectors.  The Department also contributed to the implementation of the Cabinet Directive on Regulatory Management (formerly the Cabinet Directive on Streamlining Regulation) by continuing to develop, deliver and coordinate regulatory departmental training and providing advice to EC’s regulatory community on regulatory development and approval processes.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

Atmospheric Pollutants Policy (Clean Air Agenda)

  • Planned Spending for 2012–2013: $3.04 million
  • Actual Spending for 2012–2013: $1.87 million

For additional information on this CAA program please refer to “Atmospheric pollutants policy” under Sub-Program 3.2.2.

Please refer to EC’s 2012–2013 Report on Plans and Priorities Supplementary Table for Horizontal Initiatives for further details. (under “Policy Analysis” in CARA)

Performance Analysis:

EC worked to finalize and begin implementation of the new Air Quality Management System (AQMS).  In October 2012, ministers agreed to move forward with the implementation of the system in order to further improve air quality and help protect the health of Canadians and their environment.  Under the AQMS, the federal government is responsible for establishing, under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999, the new Canadian Ambient Air Quality Standards and the base-level industrial emission requirements (BLIERs).

Through a Notice in the Canada Gazette, Part 1, on May 25, 2013, and pursuant to the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999, the federal government established as objectives the new Canadian Ambient Air Quality Standards for fine particulate matter and ozone, which were agreed to by the Ministers of the Environment in October 2012.  EC has also initiated work to inform the development of ambient standards for sulphur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide. 

New industrial emission standards for major industrial sectors and some types of equipment will be implemented using both regulations and non-regulatory instruments and implemented in phases over the course of 2013–2014. 

For relevant performance information on this CAA program, please refer to Implementation Strategy 2.1.8 under Sub-Program 3.2.1.

Top of Section

Clean Air Agenda Theme: Clean Transportation


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

Marine Sector Regulatory Initiative (Clean Air Agenda)

  • Planned Spending for 2012–2013: $2.39 million
  • Actual Spending for 2012–2013: $1.3 million

Please refer to EC’s 2012–2013 Report on Plans and Priorities Supplementary Table for Horizontal Initiatives for further details.

Performance Analysis:

EC continued its effort to reduce or enable reduction of air pollutants from the marine sector in 2012–2013. In July 2012, EC published final amendments to the Sulphur in Diesel Fuel Regulations under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999.  The new amendments ensured that fuel suppliers can provide the fuel required for the implementation of the North American Emission Control Area (ECA) in accordance with the international commitments under Annex VI of the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL).

EC also participated on Canada’s delegation to the International Maritime Organization (IMO). EC conducted scientific and policy research to inform negotiations at the IMO and for setting federal regulations.

Top of Section

Sub-Program 3.2.2 International Climate Change and Clean Air Partnerships


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

1.1.20   Develop climate change strategies aligned with the United States including working collaboratively through the U.S.–Canada Clean Energy Dialogue to advance clean energy priorities. (EC, NRCan)

1.1.20   Canada will implement the Action Plan for Phase II in coordination with the U.S. Secretariat and facilitate joint research projects in the following three focus areas: clean energy R&D and energy efficiency, carbon capture and storage, and a more efficient electricity grid based on clean and renewable generation.

1.1.46   Support the development of recommendations on possible actions to mitigate short-lived climate forcers (SLCFs), including black carbon emissions, through participation on the Arctic Council Task Force on Black Carbon, and the UNECE Long Range Transboundary Air Pollutants (LRTAP) Ad Hoc Expert Group on Black Carbon. (EC) Footnote 13

1.1.46   EC will submit a final Arctic Council Task Force report with recommendations on possible actions to mitigate SLCFs to ministers in 2013.

1.1.47   Lead Government of Canada participation in international negotiations on climate change, maintain National Registry and coordinate payment of the International Transaction Log dues. (EC)

1.1.47   Canada participates constructively in UN negotiation sessions, as well as in meetings of complementary fora. The secretariat housed in EC effectively manages and coordinates a whole-of-government approach to support to the Chief Negotiator and Ambassador for Climate Change.

Performance Analysis:

In 2012–2013, EC continued to participate in the development of recommendations for the mitigation of short-lived climate pollutants (SLCPs) while representing Canada on the Arctic Council Task Force on SLCPs. At their February 2013 meeting, Arctic Environment Ministers concluded that decisive action on black carbon and other SLCPs is needed, and encouraged coordination and support for international and global efforts to address emissions. In May 2013, the final report of the Task Force containing recommendations to mitigate black carbon and methane was submitted at the Arctic Council Ministerial meeting in Kiruna, Sweden.

In addition, on June 21, 2012 Minister Kent and U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu released the Second Action Plan under the Clean Energy Dialogue (CED). This action plan outlined work that officials within the two federal governments carried out in three thematic areas: (1) carbon capture and storage; (2) electricity grid; and (3) clean energy research and development (R&D) and energy efficiency. Over the course of 2012–2013, American and Canadian officials collaborated on several initiatives to advance work in these areas. More information on the initiatives under the CED can be found at the U.S. - Canada Clean Energy Dialogue website.

EC continued to lead the Government of Canada participation in international negotiations on climate change in various international fora and multilateral organizations, such as the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the Major Economies Forum on Energy andClimate, the Climate and Clean Air Coalition to Reduce Short-Lived Climate Pollutants, the Global Methane Initiative and the Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves. It successfully and effectively coordinated a whole-of-government approach to support the Chief Negotiator and Ambassador for Climate Change.

For related information, please refer to Clean Air Agenda programs “International Climate Change Participation and Negotiations,” “International Climate Obligations,” “Engagement and Alignment with U.S,” and “Atmospheric Pollutant Policy” below.

Please note that Canada is no longer party to the Kyoto Protocol as of December 2012.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

1.1.48.4   Develop and submit a complete and compliant annual National Inventory Report and Common Reporting Format tables to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Secretariat by April 15 to meet UNFCCC and Kyoto Protocol reporting requirements, and maintain the National Registry and coordinate payment of the International Transaction Log dues. (EC, NRCan)

1.1.48.4   Canada’s Greenhouse Gas National Inventory Report is scheduled to be submitted annually by April 15.

Performance Analysis:

A National Greenhouse Gas Inventory, compliant with UNFCCC, was submitted April 15, 2012.

Please note that Canada is no longer party to the Kyoto Protocol as of December 2012.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

1.1.43   Work with international partners to implement the commitments in the Copenhagen Accord such as mitigation targets and actions; short and long-term financing; mechanisms for technology and reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation; adaptation actions; and provisions for transparency and accountability of climate change actions.(EC, NRCan)

1.1.43   For 2012–2013: Implement projects to assist the most vulnerable states in mitigating and adapting to climate change and to ensure that Canada’s results are communicated in a transparent manner. Possible projects for the 2012–2013 fiscal year will be subject to approvals

1.1.49.2   Support Canada's participation in multilateral organizations outside the United Nations, such as Methane to Markets and Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Partnership. (EC)

1.1.49.2   Canada participates in international partnerships in order to deliver environmental and economic benefits and advance the development or deployment of clean technologies.

Performance Analysis:

In 2012–2013, EC oversaw the successful delivery of the Government of Canada $1.2 billion fast-start financing package, and directly delivered contributions of over $49 million in 2012–2013 in climate change support to developing countries. The complete list of projects can be found at EC website. EC publicly reported to the UNFCCC every year of the 3-year fast-start financing.

The Department also supported Canada’s participation in multilateral organizations outside the UNFCCC for the development and deployment of clean technologies, including the Global Methane Initiative (GMI), formally known as Methane to Markets. In partnership with the United States Environmental Protection Agency, EC successfully hosted the GMI Expo in Vancouver in March 2013.

In addition, EC continued to play a leadership role in the Climate and Clean Air Coalition, and has served on the Steering Committee since its launch in February 2012 by providing strategic and financial support to the Coalition and its numerous initiatives aimed at taking meaningful action to reduce short-lived climate pollutants in the municipal solid waste, diesel and agriculture sectors. 

For related information please refer to Clean Air Agenda programs “International climate change participation and negotiations,” “International climate obligations,” and “Engagement and alignment with U.S.” below.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

1.1.35.2   Programs focused on supplying financial aid and developing capacity to reduce GHGs and air pollutants through adoption of emission-reducing technologies and practices: implement national Vehicle Scrappage Program to encourage Canadians to retire their old high-polluting vehicles (models 1995 or earlier) and to choose more sustainable transportation options. (EC)

1.1.35.2   The program ended on March 31, 2011.

1.1.50   Asia-Pacific Partnership: Manage Canadian Asia Pacific Partnership-funded projects that promote the development, diffusion and deployment of clean technologies. (EC, NRCan, IC)

1.1.50   The APP concluded in March 2011.

Performance Analysis:

The Implementation Strategies are completed.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

1.1.51.1   Work within the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) to continue to advance emissions limitations and reductions from international aviation, including the implementation of the ICAO Programme of Action on International Aviation and Climate Change, while maintaining a high level of safety. (TC, EC)

1.1.51.1   Environment Canada provides expertise and advice to Transport Canada as needed.

Performance Analysis:

The Implementation Strategy is no longer applicable.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

2.1.31   Work with the U.S to reduce transboundary emissions under the Canada–U.S. Air Quality Agreement. (EC, HC)

2.1.31   For 2012–2013, these include:

meeting regular commitments under the Canada–U.S. Air Quality Agreement (AQA) which focuses on reducing emissions of acid rain and smog-forming pollutants; and

participating in the annual meetings of the Canada–U.S. Air Quality Committee; and making progress in advancing discussions on a PM Annex to the AQA, and in further discussions/negotiations, where appropriate, to support ongoing bilateral collaboration to reduce transboundary air pollution.

2.1.37   Continue development of a North American proposal to phase-down HFCs under the Montreal Protocol and develop complementary domestic regulations. (EC)

2.1.37   Canada, the United States and Mexico are considering resubmitting a proposal in 2012–2013.

Continue to participate in negotiation meetings with our partners--the U.S. and Mexico.

Participate in outreach activities to promote the amendment to the Montreal Protocol.

Decision(s) and/or declarations adopted at relevant international fora contribute to advancing the objectives of the proposed amendment.

Performance Analysis:

In 2012–2013, EC continued to work cooperatively with the United States to address the transboundary movement of air pollutants that cause acid rain and smog under the Canada–United States Air Quality Agreement (AQA). Both countries continue to be in full compliance with their respective commitments and the emissions of these pollutants have decreased significantly on both sides of the border since the signing of the Agreement. The 2012 biennial progress report was prepared in collaboration with the United States and expected to be published in November 2013. 

In 2013, EC hosted the annual meeting of the Canada–United States Air Quality Committee, which is responsible for administering work and reviewing the progress of AQA implementation. Under the Canada–United States Regulatory Cooperation Council, Canada and the United States agreed to consider the expansion of the Canada–United States AQA to address transboundary particulate matter. Canada and the United States are working to complete the necessary scientific and technical foundations required to inform and support the consideration of adding the Particulate Matter Annex to the Canada–United States AQA.

Furthermore, in 2012–2013, Canada worked with the United States and Mexico to build further support for the North American proposal to phase down hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) under the Montreal Protocol, including by submitting a revised version of the proposal for consideration by Parties to the Montreal Protocol and negotiating the adoption of decisions to gather additional technical and economic information on alternatives to HFCs. The North American proposal elicited significant interest and will be further considered under the Montreal Protocol in 2013–2014. In addition, the outcomes of the 2012 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20 summit) support the phase-down of HFC consumption and production.

For related information, please refer to the Clean Air Agenda program “Atmospheric pollutants policy” below.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

2.1.36   Develop extended producer responsibility Regulations for managing end-of-life ozone-depleting substances and their halocarbon alternatives.

2.1.36   The proposed Pollution Prevention Planning notice is expected to be published in the Canada Gazette, Part I, in 2012.

Performance Analysis:

EC conducted additional consultations in 2012–2013 leading to a revised proposal. The proposal is pending further information from implicated stakeholders.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

2.1.22.2   Programs focused on supplying financial aid and developing capacity to reduce GHGs and smog-forming pollutants through adoption of emission-reducing technologies and practices: implement a national Vehicle Scrappage Program to encourage Canadians to retire their old high-polluting vehicles (models 1995 or earlier) and to choose more sustainable transportation options. (EC)

2.1.22.2   The program ended on March 31, 2011.

Performance Analysis:

The Implementation Strategy was completed.

Top of Section


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

2.1.35   Participate in negotiations for revisions of the Gothenburg Protocol to Reduce Ozone, Acidification and Eutrophication under the UNECE Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution. (EC, HC)

2.1.35   Advance Canada’s positions on revisions to the Gothenburg Protocol by participating in the 50th session of the Working Group on Strategies and Review, and the 30th Session of the Executive Body.

Work to ensure the flexibility that may enable Canada to ratify the Protocol is maintained, and that the text takes account of Canada’s domestic and bilateral approaches.

Performance Analysis:

The Implementation Strategy was completed.

Top of Section

Clean Air Agenda Theme: International Actions


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

International Climate Change Participation and Negotiations (Clean Air Agenda)

  • Planned Spending for 2012–2013: $4.53 million
  • Actual Spending for 2012–2013: $3.83 million

International Climate Obligations (Clean Air Agenda)

  • Planned Spending for 2012–2013: $0.34 million
  • Actual Spending for 2012–2013: $0.31 million

Engagement and Alignment with U.S. (Clean Air Agenda)

  • Planned Spending for 2012–2013: $0.70 million
  • Actual Spending for 2012–2013: $0.47 million

Please refer to EC’s 2012–2013 Report on Plans and Priorities Supplementary Table for Horizontal Initiatives for further details.

Performance Analysis:

In 2012–2013, EC continued to play a leadership role by actively and constructively participating in the UNFCCC and in various fora such as the Major Economies Forum on Energy and Climate, in order to advance Canada’s climate change objectives with its international partners.

Similarly, EC continued to play a leadership role in the Climate and Clean Air Coalition (CCAC). The Department was instrumental in the growth of the Coalition (currently over 60 partners) and helped in the development and implementation of the Coalition’s initiatives, along with serving on the Coalition’s Steering Committee. Canada is currently leading on initiatives in the municipal solid waste, diesel, agriculture and financing mitigation of short-lived climate pollutant initiatives.

Through Canada’s fast-start financing, EC delivered $13 million to the CCAC to support the reduction of emissions of short-lived climate pollutants in developing countries. EC played a leadership role in the successful delivery of the Government of Canada $1.2 billion fast-start financing package.

Furthermore, EC directly delivered an investment of over $49 million in 2012–2013 in climate change support which contributed to strong partnerships with developing countries in Latin America and the Caribbean.

In 2012–2013, Canada continued to be an active participant in the Global Methane Initiative (GMI), an international technology partnership designed to increase the diffusion of clean technologies and address both climate change and energy security goals.

In partnership with the United States Environmental Protection Agency, EC successfully hosted the GMI Expo in Vancouver in March 2013, which provided a forum to showcase:

  • Canadian leadership in methane abatement technologies;
  • The importance of clean technology partnerships and parallel multilateral processes; and,
  • Links to international efforts to reduced Short-Lived Climate Pollutants and the development of Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions.

On June 21, 2012 Canada’s Minister of the Environment and the United States Energy Secretary released Action Plan II under the Clean Energy Dialogue (CED), featuring initiatives on carbon capture and storage, energy efficiency, and clean energy research and development. While the November 2012 U.S. election and the following transition period complicated some engagement under the CED, important work to advance common clean energy objectives was ongoing. EC also worked with Natural Resources Canada and the U.S. Department of Energy in the bilateral Clean Energy Research and Development and Energy Efficiency Working Group and supported activities in the area of biofuels, transportation, buildings and communities and energy efficiency.

For related information, please refer to implementation strategies 1.1.20, 1.1.46, 1.1.47, 1.1.43 and 1.1.49.2 under Sub-Program 3.2.2.

Top of Section

Clean Air Agenda Theme: Clean Air Regulatory Agenda (CARA)


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

Atmospheric Pollutants Policy (Clean Air Agenda)

For additional information on this CAA program please refer to “Atmospheric Pollutants Policy” under Sub-Program 3.2.1.

Please refer to EC’s 2012–2013 Report on Plans and Priorities Supplementary Table for Horizontal Initiatives for further details.

Performance Analysis:

In 2012–2013, EC provided strategic advice and policy direction to support Canada’s engagement within various international fora such as the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (CLRTAP), the Arctic Council, the Commission for Environmental Cooperation, and the Climate and Clean Air Coalition. These are fora for regional/international action on air pollution and short-lived climate pollutants, which include black carbon, methane, ozone and certain hydrofluorocarbons. For example, EC contributed to the Arctic Council Task Force on Short-Lived Climate Forcers recommendations on black carbon and methane mitigation, published May 2013, and led Canada’s delegation to CLRTAP negotiations to finalize and adopt amendments to the Gothenburg Protocol.

Environment Canada continued to work cooperatively with the United States to address the transboundary movement of air pollutants that cause acid rain and smog under the Canada–U.S. Air Quality Agreement (AQA). Both countries continue to be in full compliance with their respective commitments and the emissions of these pollutants have decreased significantly on both sides of the border since the signing of the Agreement. The 2012 biennial progress report was prepared in collaboration with the United States and published in November 2012.

For related performance information, please refer to implementation strategies 1.1.47, 1.1.46, 2.1.31 and 2.1.37 under Sub-Program 3.2.2.

Top of Section

Sub-Program 3.2.3 Environmental Technology


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

1.1.33   Develop and provide information and reports on the environmental footprint of energy technologies.  (EC)

1.1.33   Satisfaction of government decision makers with the timeliness, credibility and relevance of technology advice and assessment as measured through user group evaluation questionnaires and consultations. (Target: 80% by 2014.)

Annual reduction of emissions of GHGs (carbon dioxide equivalents) resulting from environmental technologies supported through programs (see above) to which EC contributes advice and oversight. (Target: 12.5 Mt by 2015.)

Performance Analysis:

In 2012–2013, EC continued to provide analysis and assessment of the environmental impacts of new and emerging technologies (e.g. carbon capture and storage technologies, and renewable energy technologies) to government decision makers. However, user group evaluations were not conducted in this fiscal year.

Federal technology programs in which EC participates reported that supported technologies delivered annual reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of 1.22 MT and air pollutants of 16 t. EC’s participation in these programs helped promote their alignment with the Department’s priorities for reducing GHG and air pollutant emissions and to maximize their environmental benefits.

Further, EC and Natural Resources Canada negotiated and concluded a new funding agreement ($40 million announced in Budget 2011) with Sustainable Development Technology Canada (SDTC) to support clean-technology projects that address climate change and clean air.

EC continued to lead development of the Environmental Technology Verification (ETV) standard (under the International Organization for Standardization) and finalized two new ETV protocols. EC also continued to collaborate with the Bureau de normalization du Quebec (BNQ) towards the development of a memorandum of understanding amongst BNQ, GLOBE Performance Solutions and Ministère du Développement durable, de l'Environnement et des Parcs (MDDEP), in order to align BNQ verification procedures with ETV on waste water technologies. Discussions also continued on harmonizing the ETV process in all sectors.

Top of Section

Program 3.3 Compliance Promotion and Enforcement – Pollution


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

2.1.38, 2.3.9 and 3.12.8   Deliver compliance promotion activities for key regulatory initiatives. (EC)

2.1.38, 2.3.9 and 3.12.8   In collaboration with enforcement and risk management, compliance strategies for risk management instruments related to air pollutants will be developed prior to publication in the Canada Gazette, Part II, Compliance promotion plan(s). Compliance strategies for sectors affected by instruments related to air pollutants will also be developed.

Conduct compliance promotion activities to increase stakeholder awareness of new regulations for substances newly added as of 2010 to the CEPA 1999 List of Toxic Substances.

Conduct compliance promotion activities to increase stakeholder awareness of new regulations related to substances added after 2009 to the CEPA 1999 List of Toxic Substances.

Performance Analysis:

In 2012–2013, EC started developing compliance strategies for eight air pollution prevention regulatory and Clean Air Regulatory Agenda initiatives. These initiatives cover air pollutants, green-house gases (GHGs) and multi-sector Air pollutionrRegulations. The compliance strategies identified the sectors that would be affected by the regulations and activities to encourage their compliance with the regulations on these eight initiatives. Compliance strategies were completed for two GHG regulations.

In 2012–2013, compliance promotion officers delivered activities on 2 risk management instruments (regulations and pollution prevention plans) to manage the risk of air pollution substances. Over 400 emails, letters, faxes, factsheets, information sessions and phone calls reached around 125 facilities from various sectors.

Similarly, compliance promotion officers delivered activities on 3 risk management instruments (regulations and pollution prevention plans) to manage the risk of water pollution substances. Approximately 5,000 emails, letters, faxes, factsheets, information sessions and phone calls reached over 3,600 facilities from various sectors. Both air and water pollution substances were added to the List of Toxic Substances in 2010.

For additional information please refer to Clean Air Agenda program “Compliance promotion and enforcement” under below.

Top of Section

Clean Air Agenda Theme: Clean Air Regulatory Agenda (CARA)


DSDS Implementation Strategy / CAA Program

DSDS IS Performance Expectation / CAA Expected Achievements

Compliance Promotion and Enforcement (Clean Air Agenda)

  • Planned Spending for 2012–2013: $6.72 million
  • Actual Spending for 2012–2013: $4.87 million

Please refer to EC’s 2012–2013 Report on Plans and Priorities Supplementary Table for Horizontal Initiatives for further details. (under ‘Regulations’ in the CARA Theme)

Performance Analysis:

In 2012–2013, EC undertook enforcement activities, including inspections and investigations on enforceable CARA instruments such as Off-Road Small Spark-Ignition Engine Emission Regulations. EC also provided advice during the development of existing and upcoming regulatory initiatives to ensure enforceability of CARA regulations. Training was developed and delivered to enforcement officers on On-Road Vehicle and Engine Emission Regulations, Off-Road Compression-Ignition Engine Emission Regulations and Off-Road Small Spark-Ignition Engine Emission Regulations, Marine Spark-Ignition Engine, Vessel and Off-Road Recreational Vehicle Emission Regulations, and Passenger Automobile and Light Truck Greenhouse Gas Emission Regulations.

As part of EC’s information management systems, preliminary analysis of data models were performed and input was provided to EC’s application to Canada Revenue Agency for data access, and to address data quality issues.

The Department continued to maintain capacity and provide sound science, testing and expertise in support of the CARA regulatory measures, including compliance promotion and enforcement activities associated with Transportation and Consumer and Commercial Products regulations.

For additional information, please refer to implementation strategies 2.1.38, 2.3.9 and 3.12.8 under Program 3.3 above.

Top of Section


Additional Information

Environment Canada is a participant in the FSDS and contributes to the Greening Government Operations (GGO) targets through the Internal Services Program. The Department contributes to the following target areas of Theme IV of the FSDS:

  • Green Buildings
  • Green Procurement
  • E-Waste, Managed Print, Paper Consumption and Green Meetings
  • Greenhouse Gas Emissions

For additional details on Environment Canada's GGO activities, please see Environment Canada’s Supplementary Information Tables under the Performance Report for the period ending March 31, 2013.

For additional details on the FSDS, please visit the FSDS website.

Footnotes

Footnote 9

The environmental emergency response function has since been centralized in Montreal.

Return to footnote 9 referrer

Footnote 10

The environmental emergency response function has since been centralized in Montreal.

Return to footnote 10 referrer

Footnote 11

A national urban and rural federal-provincial-territorial air quality monitoring network.

Return to footnote 11 referrer

Footnote 12

A national air quality network led by EC that reports on regional patterns and trends of atmospheric pollutants in both air and precipitation.

Return to footnote 12 referrer

Footnote 13

The Ad Hoc Expert Group on Black Carbon under the UNECE’s Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution (CLRTAP) concluded its work to develop recommendations in 2010, which formed the basis of black carbon-related amendments to the Gothenburg Protocol to the CLRTAP.

Return to footnote 13 referrer

Page 4
Date modified: