This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.
Textile Mills that Use Wet Processing
Final Summary Report: Pollution Prevention Planning and Effluents from Textile Mills that use Wet Processing and Nonylphenol and its Ethoxylates
Last Updated: July 2012
Final Summary Report: Pollution Prevention Planning and Effluents from Textile Mills that use Wet Processing and Nonylphenol and its Ethoxylates (PDF; 92 KB)
Textile Mill Effluents (TMEs) and Nonylphenol and its Ethoxylates (NP-NPEs) – What are they and why is pollution prevention important?
TMEs are wastewater discharges from textile mills produced during wet processes such as scouring, neutralizing, desizing, mercerizing, carbonizing, fulling, bleaching, dyeing and printing. They are complex mixtures of chemicals, whose composition varies over time and from one mill to another. Untreated TMEs may include high concentrations of NP-NPEs, suspended solids, metals, and other organic substances. Untreated TMEs can also exhibit extreme pH variations and elevated temperatures.
Assessments of NP-NPEs and TMEs found that they were entering the environment in a quantity or concentration or under conditions that have or may have an immediate or long-term harmful effect on the environment or its biological diversity. As a result, in 2002, NP-NPEs and TMEs were added to the List of Toxic Substances in Schedule 1 of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (CEPA 1999).
Prior to the publication of the Notice requiring the preparation and implementation of pollution prevention plans in respect of effluents from textile mills that use wet processing (TMEs) and nonylphenol (NP) and its ethoxylates (NPEs) (the Notice), NP-NPEs constituted a major class of surfactants used in the textile wet processing industry. It was estimated that the textile sector was responsible for 18% of the NP-NPEs released annually in Canada.
Why Pollution Prevention Planning?
In 2002, Environment Canada published a Risk Management Strategy in Respect of Effluents from Textile Mills that Use Wet Processing (TMEs) and Nonylphenol (NP) and its Ethoxylates (NPEs) Under CEPA 1999. The Strategy, which was revised in 2005, outlines the risk management objectives as well as the recommended risk management instrument, which was pollution prevention planning.
Pollution Prevention (P2) Planning Notices are instruments that require specified persons, including companies, to prepare and implement pollution prevention plans. Pollution Prevention encourages pollution reduction at the source rather than treatment and is defined as “the use of processes, practices, materials, products, substances or energy that avoid or minimize the creation of pollutants and waste, and reduce the overall risk to the environment or human health” (CEPA 1999).
P2 Planning Notice Requirements
Environment Canada published the Notice in the Canada Gazette on December 4, 2004. Persons subject to the Notice included all wet processing textile mills that discharged their effluents to a municipal wastewater treatment system and had a daily effluent flow greater than 30 m3/day, based on average annual discharge, at least one year between 1999 and 2003. Affected persons were required to prepare and implement a P2 plan that took into consideration the following two objectives:
- reducing, by 2009, the annual use of NP-NPEs by at least 97%, relative to the annual use for the base year (1998 for most mills) and;
- reducing the toxicity of TMEs to a level equivalent to or greater than 13% IC50 (50% inhibiting concentration) by 2009.
Over sixty mills submitted Declarations that plans were prepared and being implemented, identifying themselves to be subject to the Notice. The majority of these mills were located in Quebec (59%) and Ontario (38%). The remainder were located in Nova Scotia (3%). As of December 2011, twenty-one of these mills have closed or ceased wet processing activities.
A mill may perform one or several types of wet processing activities. The percentage of mills performing each wet processing activity, according to their Declarations of Implementation, can be seen in Figure 1 below.
Figure 1: Textile Mill Wet Processing Activities
Figure 1: Textile Mill Wet Processing Activities – Description
This bar graph shows the percentage of mills performing different wet processing activities. Respondents may be included in more than one category. Wet processing activities, according to the Declarations of Implementation, in order from the highest to lowest percentage are as follows:
- Dyeing (85 percent)
- Bleaching (62 percent)
- Wet finishing (58 percent)
- Scouring (52 percent)
- Neutralizing (33 percent)
- Desizing (21 percent)
- Printing (13 percent)
- Other (10 percent)
- Mercerizing (7 percent)
- Carbonizing (2 percent)
- Fulling (2 percent)
The NP-NPE reduction target of 97% has been surpassed; NP-NPE use was reduced by 99.99% from the base year (1998 for most mills) to the implementation year (2009 for most mills). The amount of NP-NPEs used declined from 207 069 kg in the base year to 20.2 kg in the implementation year, as can be seen in Figure 2 below.
Figure 2: Quantities of NP-NPEs used by Textile Mills
Figure 2: Quantities of NP-NPEs used by Textile Mills – Description
The bar graph shows the quantities of NP-NPEs used, in kilograms, as reported by the textile mills.
- Mills were using 207 069 kilograms of NP-NPEs in their respective base years (1998 for most mills).
- In the preparation year, the amount of NP-NPEs used dropped by 95.3 percent to 9643 kilograms.
- NP-NPE use continued to decrease:
- 695 kilograms used during the first progress report period indicating a decrease of 99.6 percent from the base year,
- 492 kilograms used during the second progress report period indicating a decrease of 99.8 percent from the base year,
- 52 kilograms used during the third progress report period indicating a decrease of 99.98 percent from the base year.
- By the implementation year (2009 for most mills) the amount of NP-NPEs used by mills was 20.2 kilograms giving an overall reduction of 99.99 percent from the base year.
Mills were required to reduce their toxicity to a level equivalent to or greater than an IC50 of 13%. A minimum of four toxicity tests were to be performed throughout the year in order to determine if this objective was met. However, where mills performed less than four toxicity tests, they were considered by Environment Canada to have met the objective if all toxicity results were equal to or above 13%. This assumption introduces some uncertainty to the results. Where mills took more than four toxicity tests, those that passed at least four tests were considered to have met the objective. The four mills that did not provide any toxicity test results are now closed.
According to Environment Canada’s analysis of active mills, the majority (61%) were considered to have met the objective and a further 31% demonstrated that they passed some, but not all, of their toxicity tests. Therefore, 92% of active mills were considered to have met or partially met the requirements. Eight percent of mills did not pass any of their toxicity tests. However, overall TME toxicity levels have improved since the Notice was published.
The Notice has largely been successful. The risk management objective for NP-NPEs was surpassed and although the risk management objective for TMEs was not fully achieved, it was met or partially met by 92% of mills.
NP-NPEs will continue to be monitored in wastewater treatment plant effluents to determine if further risk management of other sources is warranted.
NP-NPEs are not solely responsible for TME toxicity, as can be seen from the results achieved. Other substances contribute to TME toxicity including: phosphates, dyes and solvents. Currently, many substances that are used by textile manufacturers are being assessed under the Chemicals Management Plan (CMP). If it is determined that any of these substances are considered harmful to human health or the environment, risk management actions can be taken to contribute to further reducing TME toxicity. Additionally, the Wastewater Systems Effluent RegulationsFootnote 1 established under the Fisheries Act include mandatory minimum effluent quality standards that can be achieved through secondary wastewater treatment. It is anticipated that these Regulations will have a further effect on reducing the impact of TMEs on the environment.
- Notice Requiring the Preparation and Implementation of Pollution Prevention Plans in Respect of Effluents from Textile Mills that Use Wet Processing (TMEs) and Nonylphenol (NP) and its Ethoxylates (NPEs)
- Risk Management Strategy in Respect of Effluents from Textile Mills that Use Wet Processing (TMEs) and Nonylphenol (NP) and its Ethoxylates (NPEs) Under CEPA 1999 (revised 2005)
- Date modified: