July 2011
Previous page | Table of Contents
| Evaluation Issue | Achieved | Progress Made; Attention Needed |
Little Progress; Priority for Attention |
N/A |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Relevance: | ||||
| Continued need for the program | ||||
1.
Was there a need for the project? Is there a need for the project to continue?
|
✓ | |||
| Alignment with federal government priorities | ||||
2.
Is the project aligned with federal government priorities?
|
✓ | |||
| Consistency with federal roles | ||||
3.
Is the project consistent with federal roles and responsibilities?
|
✓ | |||
| Performance – Project Design and Delivery: | ||||
4.
Are appropriate performance data being collected, captured and safeguarded? If so, is this information being used to inform senior management / decision makers?
|
✓ | |||
5.
Is the program design appropriate for achieving expected program results?
|
✓ | |||
6.
Are there any barriers or challenges that could affect the success of this project if it were to be implemented nationally or integrated into an existing national project?
|
✓ | |||
7.
Have the results of the pilot project been communicated effectively? How could communications be improved?
|
✓ | |||
8.
What are the best practices and lessons learned as a result of the project?
|
✓ | |||
| Performance – Effectiveness: | ||||
9.
To what extent have the intended outputs and outcomes been achieved as a result of the project?
|
✓ | |||
10.
Have there been any unintended outcomes, either positive or negative?
|
✓ | |||
| Performance – Efficiency and Economy: | ||||
11.
Has the project undertaken its activities and delivered products (e.g., technical studies) in the most efficient manner?
|
✓ | |||
12.
Has the project achieved, or is it on track to achieving, its intended outcomes in the most economical manner?
|
✓ | |||